Cases 1 - 10 of 1,979
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv02227
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Dent v. AMRESORTS, L.P. et al
as 2:2024cv06354
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS, 1-10, APPLE LEISURE GROUP, AMRESORTS, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Brigitte Dent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv24586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Franco v. Hyatt Corporation
as 24-3008
Defendant:
HYATT CORPORATION and NICOLE HALL
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FRANCO
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv01002
Defendant:
Khalil Cooke, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Nazeer Tyree Wiggins and others
Plaintiff:
Sallamondra Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Franco v. Hyatt Corporation
as 1:2024cv08740
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franco
Defendant:
Hyatt Corporation doing business as Hyatt Corporation Times Square
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. Hyatt Hotels Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv24429
Defendant:
XYZ Defendants, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Hyatt Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01979
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Sadik v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv02060
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25 and Hyatt Corporation
Plaintiff:
Austin Sadik
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
