Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Redbrook v. Rydell et al
as 8:2026cv02682
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Redbrook
Defendant:
District Attorney Alexandria Peyton Rydell, Brian GodCharles and Gayle Lorenzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Rothnell et al
as 1:2026cv08026
Plaintiff:
Carlos Irvin
Defendant:
Warden Courtney Rothnell, Captain Williams, Captain Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Power v. City of Irvine et al
as 8:2026cv02601
Plaintiff:
Meredith Power
Defendant:
City of Irvine, Laura Murphy and Does 1-20, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IRVINE v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv11936
Plaintiff:
BRENTON IRVINE
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Porter v. City of Cornelia, Georgia et al
as 2:2026cv00294
Plaintiff:
Marko Anthony Porter
Defendant:
City of Cornelia, Georgia and Christopher Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gertner et al
as 1:2026cv07216
Plaintiff:
Murray Gertner, Robert Guthoff, Thomas Halton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv09417
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04814
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
