Cases 41 - 50 of 413
Rodriguez-Valentin et al v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Yovanka Iris Rodriguez-Valentin, Gabriel Olmeda-Valentin, Mason Edgar Aponte-Valentin and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Iris Vasquez-Rivera v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1932
Petitioner:
IRIS BANESSA VASQUEZ-RIVERA, M.E.V.V. and A.V.V.V.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Iris Izaguirre-Mendoza, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3726
Petitioner:
IRIS YOLANDA IZAGUIRRE-MENDOZA, JOSEP MAURICIO PINEDA-IZAGUIRRE and LUIS ISAAC PINEDA-IZAGUIRRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Martinez-Carrion v. Hospital Menonita Caguas, Inc.
as 22-1655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELSA IRIS MARTINEZ-CARRION
Defendant / Appellee:
HOSPITAL MENONITA CAGUAS, INC.
Defendant:
PLAN DE SALUD MENONITA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00770
Plaintiff:
Adams, April Burch, Tarrah Ciarimboli and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
RIVERA MORALES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00563
Petitioner:
IRIS RIVERA MORALES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Torres-Penaloza v. Garland
as 22-777
Petitioner:
GABINA TORRES-PENALOZA, ANA IRIS FIERRO-TORRES and MAURO FIERRO-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez v. Jim Koons Management Company
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Iris Perez
Defendant:
JIM KOONS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, d/b/a JIM KOONS AUTOMOTIVE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
