Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomas v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
Isaac Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FRAMPTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20050
Plaintiff:
ISAAC THOMAS FRAMPTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews v. Moore et al
as 3:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Quinton Andrews
Defendant:
Officer Laura A. McGlone, Officer Isaac Thomas, Officer William C. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORROW v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv04385
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
ISAAC THOMAS MORROW and THE ESTATE OF MARGARET RUETTA WHEELER MORROW
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv07575
Plaintiff:
ISAAC THOMAS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Isaac Thoma
as 18-10956
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISAAC THOMAS
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv15640
Plaintiff:
Teola Thomas and Isaac Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isaac Flores v. M. McDonald, et al
as 14-15365
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISAAC THOMAS FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
M. D. MCDONALD and ON HABEAS CORPUS
Thomas v. State of Texas
as 1:2013cv00350
Petitioner:
Isaac Thomas
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
