Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Hernandez-Barraza v. Wrigley
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JOSE ISRAEL HERNANDEZ-BARRAZA
Respondent:
JEFF WRIGLEY
American Rent-A-Car v. Hernandez
as 4:2023cv13180
Plaintiff:
American Rent-A-Car
Defendant:
Israel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
American Rent-A-Car v. Hernandez
as 2:2023cv13178
Plaintiff:
American Rent-A-Car
Defendant:
Israel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hernandez-Barraza v. Thornell
as 2:2023cv02087
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez-Barraza
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Royster v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tyler D. Royster
Defendant:
United States of America, Melanie S. Griffin, Department of Business and Professional Regulations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03913
Plaintiff:
GONZALEZ ISRAEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barraza v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez Barraza
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01232
Petitioner:
Israel Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERNANDEZ v. MERENDINO
as 1:2022cv05890
Petitioner:
ISRAEL HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
S. MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
