Cases 1 - 10 of 100
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. C3 Industrial Blasting & Coatings, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00232
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, The Finishing Trades Institute, IUPAT Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
C3 Industrial Blasting & Coatings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Bernward Consulting Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2025cv02110
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the IUPAT District Council No. 51 Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Finishing Trades Institute of the International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, Trustees of the Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Fund and others
Defendant:
BERNWARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES, LLC and Carl Neimeyer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds et al v. Fine Art Imaging
as 1:2025cv02957
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds and International Union of Painters and Allied Trades Metal Polishers, Production and Novelty Workers Local Union 8A-28A, District Council No. 9, IUPAT, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Fine Art Imaging
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Miller Painting Co., Inc.
as 4:2025cv00113
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, The Finishing Trades Institute, IUPAT Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
Miller Painting Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Doe, et al v. Noem, et al
as 25-1384
Plaintiff:
SVITLANA DOE, MAKSYM DOE, MARIA DOE and others
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF BOSTON, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CA, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA and others
Defendant:
KRISTI NOEM, in the official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, PETE R. FLORES, in the official capacity as Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, RODNEY S. SCOTT, in the official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Specialty Woodwork et al
as 1:2024cv03610
Plaintiff:
IUPAT Industry Pension Plan, Daniel R. Williams, The Finishing Trades Institute Fund and others
Defendant:
Specialty Woodwork and Drywall, Inc. and Specialty Woodwork, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. C3 Industrial Blasting & Coatings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03501
Plaintiff:
Daniel Williams, The Finishing Trades Institute, International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
C3 Industrial Blasting & Coatings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Miller Painting Co., Inc.
as 1:2024cv03441
Plaintiff:
IUPAT Industry Pension Plan, Paul Canning, Southern Painters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Miller Painting Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv03440
Defendant:
Daniel Williams, Miller Painting Co., Inc. and Southern Painters Welfare Fund
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Annuity Plan, Finishing Trades Institute of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 77, International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. C&S Glass, LLC
as 1:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
IUPAT Industry Pension Plan, Southern Painters Welfare Fund, Bruce Wohl and others
Defendant:
C&S Glass, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
