Cases 41 - 50 of 80
USA v. Sergio Lopez-Leo
as 12-40522
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SERGIO IVAN LOPEZ-LEOS, also known as Jouventino Valencia-Salazar, also known as Sergio Ivan Lopes, also known as Cerjio Ivan Leos, also known as Carlos Homero Trevino
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. One of the Conected [sic] Wire, et al
as 12-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE OF THE CONNECTED WIRED MEMBERS OF A BIG INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, CONECTED [SIC], WIRED MEMBER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CONECTED [SIC], WIRED SOLDIERS
LOPEZ v. VIDONISH et al
as 2:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
PETER VIDONISH, CRAIG HAYWOOD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS JOHN WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Petitioner:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS JOHN WETZEL and SUPERINTENDENT LOUIS S. FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosales et al v. Miranda et al
as 1:2012cv20256
Defendant:
Sofia L. Miranda and BST Preservation Management & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jellinek Israel Rosales and Roger Ivan Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
USA v. Ivan Lopez
as 11-50372
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Mendez v. Doe
as 11-4107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN 1 DOE, and this criminal organization
Ivan Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70193
Petitioner:
IVAN LOPEZ, AKA Ivan Ramirez-Lopez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
