Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alpha Mansaray v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2050
Petitioner:
ALPHA IBRAHIM BAH MANSARAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Alpha Mansaray v. Andrea King-Wessels
as 21-7166
Petitioner:
ALPHA IBRAHIM BAH MANSARAY
Respondent:
ANDREA KING-WESSELS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Howard County Detention Center, FRANCISCO MADRIGAL, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations Baltimore Field Office, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01044
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. Mansaray et al
as 1:2020cv01303
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jack Kavanaugh, Alpha Ibrahim Bah Mansaray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mansaray v. Kavanaugh et al
as 1:2020cv01304
Plaintiff:
Alpha Ibrahim Bah Mansaray
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jack Kavanaugh, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bah v. Alsco Co.
as 1:2018cv01326
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Bah
Defendant:
Alsco Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wydra et al v. Bah et al
as 3:2015cv01513
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wydra and Nancy Wydra
Defendant:
Ibrahim Bah and Bangla Car & Limo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bah v. Holder
as 12-3184
Petitioner:
Ibrahim Bah
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Bah v. Keisler et al
as 8:2007cv02822
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Bah
Defendant:
Peter D. Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Bah v. Prizinsky
as 1:2007cv00656
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Bah
Defendant:
Anthony Prizinsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
