Cases 61 - 70 of 189
Hindman v. Stamina Products, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Justin Neil Hindman and Amy Hindman
Defendant:
Stamina Products, Inc. , Gold's Gym International, Inc. , TRT Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shotwell v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14336
Plaintiff:
Stacy Shotwell
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Proform Pt, LLC
as 6:2015cv01887
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
ProForm PT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
USAA Texas Lloyds Company v. Icon Health & Fitness Inc
as 3:2015cv03456
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness Inc
Plaintiff:
USAA Texas Lloyds Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13713
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Robertson
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ICON Health & Fitness Incorporated v. Korhun
as 2:2015cv01981
Defendant:
Oleksandr Korhun
Plaintiff:
ICON Health & Fitness Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ICON HEALTH & FITNESS INC
as 2:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
ICON HEALTH & FITNESS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Icon Health & Fitness v. Polar Electro Oy, et al
as 15-4104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
POLAR ELECTRO OY, a Finnish company and POLAR ELECTRO INC., a Delaware corporation
W.A.Y.S.S. Inc. v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05023
Plaintiff:
W.A.Y.S.S. Inc.
Defendant:
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
