Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hartzell v. Insight Global LLC
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
John Hartzell
Defendant:
Insight Global, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Coleman et al v. Optum Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05664
Plaintiff:
VERNAIZE K COLEMAN, CYNTHIA HOLMES, DANIELA PORCINO and others
Defendant:
Optum Inc., INSIGHT GLOBAL,LLC, Apex Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
Insight Global, LLC v. Premier Enterprise Media Services Consultants Group Limited Liability Company, et al
as 2:2023cv05856
Plaintiff:
Insight Global, LLC
Defendant:
Premier Enterprise Media Services Consultants Group Limited Liability Company and Thurman Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fromhold v. Insight Global LLC
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael Fromhold
Defendant:
Insight Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Archer v. Mandex, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01839
Plaintiff:
Calbert Archer
Defendant:
Mandex, Inc., Insight Global, LLC and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3142 Davis-Bacon Act (prevailing wages)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
