Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Richard Di Donato, et al v. John Kapoor, et al
as 19-80135
Defendant:
MICHAEL L. BABICH, ALEC BURLAKOFF, INSYS THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED and others
Not Yet Classified:
RICHARD DI DONATO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and JOHN N. KAPOOR
Plaintiff:
CLARK MILLER
City of Fullerton et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02321
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
city of fullerton, The People of the State of California, by and through Fullerton City Attorney Richard D. Jones and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tucson Medical Center v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Purdue Pharma LP, Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of Alameda, California et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02307
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
County of Alameda, California and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prescott, City of v. Allergan PLC et al
as 3:2019cv08165
Defendant:
Actavis Incorporated, Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
Prescott, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of El Monte et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv03588
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through El Monte City Attorney Rick Olivarez, City of El Monte and The People of The State of California
Petitioner:
ALLERGAN FINANCE, LLC, F/K/A/ ACTAVIS, INC., F/K/A WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
