Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Hernandez-Hernandez
as 24-10196
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ismael Hernandez-Hernandez
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
Department of Justice, 2nd Cir. CT of Appeals, 40 Foley Square and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Padilla v. 203rd District Courts et al
as 3:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
203rd District Courts, Mayor of Dallas County, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. 203rd District Courts et al
as 2:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
203rd District Courts, Mayor of Dallas County, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11481
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
