Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Juan Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11338
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN IVAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Inabinet et al v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office, The et al
as 6:2019cv01501
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Inabinet, Valerie Inabinet, Brittany Inabinet and others
Defendant:
Ivan Rodriguez, Greenville County Sheriff's Office, The, Greenville County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv02992
Petitioner:
Juan Ivan Rodriguez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01881
Petitioner:
Ivan Rodriguez
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 7:2014cv00413
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Ivan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
IVAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Hendrix
as 5:2014cv05035
Plaintiff:
Edgar Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv04443
Petitioner:
Ivan Rodriguez
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Rodriguez et al v. Hendrix
as 5:2013cv05249
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Rodriguez, Julio Jesus Rodriguez and Edgar Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00644
Petitioner:
Ivan Rodriguez
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
