Cases 1 - 10 of 19
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08679
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J BRAZIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brazil v. Gillison et al
as 1:2020cv00400
Plaintiff:
Dr. Maria J. Brazil
Defendant:
Corporal Matthew Gillison, Officer Kevin Pegan, Kendallville Police Department and others
Not Classified By Court:
Dan Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97423
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J BRAZIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAZILL v. DILLE et al
as 4:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
TREVOR J BRAZILL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DILLE and JONATHAN L GUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Walsh, III v. John Brazil, et al
as 16-3355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. WALSH, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. BRAZIL, Esq. and COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA
Walsh v. Brazil et al
as 3:2016cv01560
Plaintiff:
John R. Walsh, III
Defendant:
John J. Brazil and County of Lackawanna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeanne Zaloga, et al v. Borough of Moosic, et al
as 15-2723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEANNE ZALOGA, EDWARD ZALOGA, D.O., C.P.A. and CORRECTIONAL CARE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF MOOSIC, MOOSIC BOROUGH COUNCIL, MOOSIC BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH MERCATILI, Individually and in his official capacityas President of Moosic Borough Council
Brazil v. Colvin
as 0:2015cv01631
Plaintiff:
Shari J. Brazil
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John Young v. Aron Wolfe, et al
as 13-56438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
ARON WOLFE, SHANNON, Sr. Dep., MICHAEL SMITH, Dep. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv01925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 294
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
