Cases 1 - 10 of 93
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mathena et al
as 7:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Randall C. Mathena, Lois Fegan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. Mailroom Supervisor JB et al
as 7:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
Mailroom Supervisor JB, Warden Rick White and Major J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joel Muir v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1754
Plaintiff:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J. FREEMAN and others
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
L. Davies, J. Hall and A. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Rick White, D. Turner, Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Wisner et al
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Matthew Joseph Douglas
Respondent:
Geri Wisner, Matthew J. Hall and Lisa Otipoby-Herbert
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
