Cases 1 - 10 of 1,038
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C v. Broussard et al
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C
Defendant:
Jeremy Broussard, Patricia Ryan Cenac Estate, Shane Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Jones, Sr. v. Kaushal et al
as 8:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Terance J Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Alash Kaushal and PTL Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Damile Mitchell v. Earl Jones, et al
as 24-1308
Plaintiff:
DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant:
EARL J. JONES, Deputy Superintendent for Facility, BRIAN FLINCHBAUGH, Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services, CAMPBELL, Captain at SCI-Albion and others
Jones v. Kaushal et al
as 8:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Terence J. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Alash Kaushal and PTL Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Jones v. Bennet et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Jones
Defendant:
Clay Bennet and Shondra Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navado Jones v. Attorney General, State of Georgia
as 24-11028
Petitioner:
NAVADO J. JONES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
