Cases 1 - 10 of 143
BANILLA GAMES, INC. et al v. REYES
as 2:2024cv00580
Defendant:
GILMA N. REYES and IRIS J. SALAZAR
Plaintiff:
BANILLA GAMES, INC. and GROVER GAMING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Strobel v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv01791
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Robert Strobel
Defendant:
United States of America, J. Salazar, D. Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Kathleen Allison, Kristin Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Salazar et al
as 3:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tyrone Izal Hairston
Defendant:
J. Salazar, N. Rodriguez and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Arnez Salazar
as 22-2696
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARNEZ J. SALAZAR
Salazar et al v. Mar Tile Design Corp. et al
as 6:2022cv01678
Plaintiff:
Roneld J. Salazar and Antonio J. Scaramella
Defendant:
Mar Tile Design Corp. and Jose J. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Salazar #258054 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01465
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Salazar
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Pruitt, Unknown Uehling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Donaldson v. Garland et al
as 2:2021cv01178
Plaintiff:
Richard Julius Donaldson
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, J. Salazar, J. Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donaldson v. Garland et al
as 5:2021cv05029
Defendant:
Kevin Williams, J. Salazar, Potichkin and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Julius Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
