Cases 21 - 30 of 116
Gonzalez v. Tancreto et al
as 5:2020cv07717
Defendant:
J Haskill, Tancreto, Sevy and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Amador Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. USA
as 1:2020cv00427
Petitioner:
Gerald J. Silva
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Delgado et al v. J. Silva Sprinkler and Plumbing of New York Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv03681
Plaintiff:
Francisco Bove and Jose Delgado
Defendant:
J. Silva Sprinkler and Plumbing of New York Corp. doing business as J. Silva Sprinkler & Plumbing and Gabriel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Silva v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00012
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Dangerous Fugitives Task Force of, William E. Smith, C.J. Wyatt and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanza v. Moclock et al
as 3:2019cv02137
Defendant:
Trisha Kelley, Superintendent McGinley, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Enrico Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SILVA et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv20557
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SHELLIE SILVA and MANUEL J. SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silva v. Martin, et al
as 1:2019cv00596
Defendant:
Wilder Arboleda, Corporation Director Gary Berdugo, Herman Yipi and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hwa Sim v. Monica Duran, et al
as 19-17291
Defendant:
S. HANZEL, Correctional Officer, B. CHAMBERS, Correctional Officer, TOWLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHAL, Doctor, MONICA DURAN, Correctional Officer and PATEL, Doctor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HWA SUNG SIM
Silva v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2019cv00568
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
