Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Reddick v. Justice et al
as 2:2013cv03379
Plaintiff:
Belay Reddick
Defendant:
Pamela Justice, Mary M Mitchell, J Hollett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinnedy v. Pate et al
as 6:2013cv01793
Plaintiff:
William C McKinnedy, III
Defendant:
John R Pate, William Byars, Jr, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Presley v. Prodan et al
as 3:2012cv03511
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Presley
Defendant:
Michael Prodan, W Allen Myrick, Donald J Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Simmons v. USA
as 2:2012cv02418
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Antonio J Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Antonio Simmon
as 11-5090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO J. SIMMONS
SIMMONS v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00636
Petitioner:
EARNEST J. SIMMONS
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-8228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Defendant - None:
AMERICAN AMENITIES INCORPORATED, Distributor of toothpaste and deoderant
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
