Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Carter v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv00991
Defendant:
J Anderson and Jon Ozmit
Plaintiff:
Raymond W Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tammy Shaw v. Lynchburg Department of Social
as 09-1210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMMY J. SHAW, KGS, minor by her next friend, CAS, minor by her next friend and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNCHBURG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, BOB MCDONNELL, State Attorney General, ELEANOR DUNN, Deputy City Attorney and others
Sealed Defendant 7 v. USA
as 5:2009cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arthur J. Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shaw et al v. Lynchburg Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tammy J. Shaw, KGS, CAS and others
Defendant:
Lynchburg Department of Social Services, Bob McDonnell, Eleanor Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 5:2007ct03156
Plaintiff:
Rickie J. Anderson
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Doctor VMESI, H.H. House Properties & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Bean et al
as 5:2007ct03138
Plaintiff:
Rickie J. Anderson
Defendant:
Steve Bean, Kim Walls, Brenda Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. v. INTELLIGENT OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00281
Plaintiff:
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. and STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC.
Defendant:
INTELLIGENT OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. and REZA H. AHMADI
Counter Claimant:
INTELLIGENT OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. and REZA H. AHMADI
Counter Defendant:
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC.
Mediator:
J. ANDERSON LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
