Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Robledo-Valdez v. Charest, et al
as 26-1083
Plaintiff:
C.S. ROBLEDO-VALDEZ
Defendant:
J. CHAREST, TODD GEDDES, SARAH A. HALL and others
Charest v. Peters
as 1:2025cv00477
Petitioner:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Respondent:
Ken Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE v. CHAREST
as 2:2025cv00137
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Defendant:
JESSICA A CHAREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Robledo (PS) v. Charest et al
as 1:2025cv00925
Plaintiff:
C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Todd Geddes, Megan Zimmerman, J. Charest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charest v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Denise Charest
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Patrick Charest
as 23-13545
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICK J. CHAREST
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
CHAREST v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22907
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOSEPH CHAREST, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disability Rights Rhode Island v. Charest et al
as 1:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Rhode Island
Defendant:
Richard Charest and Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities, and Hospitals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bosarge et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Patrick Charest, Clifford Ellis, Robert George and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Janet L. Yellen, Kay E. Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
