Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Jones v. Dever et al
as 5:2023ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III, G. Alan DuBois, April Bun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jesse Almendarez v. US
as 22-7410
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE ALMENDAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT J. DODSON and ROBERT J. HIGDON, JR.
Jesse Almendarez v. US
as 22-7395
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE ALMENDAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT J. DODSON and ROBERT J. HIGDON, JR.
Almendarez v. United States et al
as 5:2022hc02142
Petitioner:
Jesse Almendarez
Respondent:
United States, Robert J. Dodson and Robert J. Higdon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Almendarez v. United States et al
as 5:2022hc02130
Petitioner:
Jesse Almendarez
Respondent:
United States, Robert J. Dodson and Robert J. Higdon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Southard v. Dodson et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joe D. Southard, II
Defendant:
J. Dodson and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southard v. Bridges et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Joe D. Southard, II
Defendant:
D. Bridges and J. Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metz v. Dodson et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
George D. Metz, II
Defendant:
J. Dodson and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jesse Almendarez v. US
as 22-6275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE ALMENDAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT J. DODSON and ROBERT J. HIGDON, JR.
Metz v. Bridges et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
George D. Metz, II
Defendant:
D. Bridges and J. Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
