Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jane Doe NLG (445367) v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10467
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe NLG (445367)
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2026cv05683
Plaintiff:
Sakeenah Nadirah Williams
Defendant:
The County of Nassau, The Nassau County Police Department, Sergeant Robert D. Galgano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pedersen v. Youngblut et al
as 4:2026cv00388
Plaintiff:
Danielle Marie Pedersen
Defendant:
Brad Youngblut, John Doe and Des Moines Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jane Doe PNA (S.C.)3 v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv10455
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (S.C.)3
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA - LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Haddad v. DOES 1-50
as 2:2026cv10484
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Haddad
Defendant:
DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mata, Jr. v. Doe et al
as 3:2026cv02398
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Mata, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Officer John Doe, Lieutenant John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEVIN v. SWEIGART et al
as 3:2026cv12178
Plaintiff:
HARRY JAY LEVIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL SWEIGART, BAJA UNLIMITED, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Hines v. Applewhite et al
as 2:2026cv00145
Plaintiff:
Amos Hines, III
Defendant:
Cassandra Applewhite, Preston Gracey, Andrea Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
v. Buffalo City Hall et al
as 1:2026cv01998
Defendant:
Buffalo City Hall, ERIE COUNTY, Rondey Bulls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DOE et al
as 1:2026cv08045
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE and Amy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
