Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Charles Benson v. K. Grinstead, et al
as 22-2062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES A. BENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
K. GRINSTEAD, also known as Kyle Grinstead, J. LEE, D. GARD, Captain and others
Smith v. Caffey et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
DeQuincy Smith
Defendant:
Ahmari Caffey, Head, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Boyd
as 8:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Talon J. Lee
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKS v. SEVIER et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH BROOKS
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, J. LEE, S. SAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv08629
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lee, Daeshawn McCray, Kevin Terry and others
Defendant:
Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, Capt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENSON v. GRINSTEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02408
Defendant:
K GRINSTEAD, KYLE GRINSTEAD, GARD and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. BENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Grinstead et al
as 3:2021cv00659
Defendant:
K Grinstead, Kyle Grinstead, Gard and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A Benson
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00317
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Michael J. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Cervantes v. Lee et al
as 2:2020cv02416
Defendant:
Derreck J. Lee and S. Burciaga
Plaintiff:
Raul Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. New York County Midtown 53rd Police Precent et al
as 1:2020cv09290
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
