Cases
Means et al v. C.R Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00801
Defendant: Davol Inc and C.R Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Terrance J. Means and Terraance J. Means
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Testa v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv01179
Plaintiff: Christian Testa
Defendant: Mike Williams , Tara Wildes , City of Jacksonville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall v. White Marshall et al
as 4:2013cv00506
Plaintiff: Sharon Denise Marshall
Defendant: Annie L. White Marshall, Byron A. Marshall, DeAnda D. Marshall Means and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
William Victor, et al v. R. Lawler, et al
as 11-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee: WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant - Appellee: R. M. LAWLER, M. W. HARLOW, DORINA VARNER and others
Singleton v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2011cv00069
Plaintiff: Sammie Singleton
Defendant: John H. Rutherford and T. J. Means
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Means
as 3:2010cv01051
Plaintiff: Sammie L. Singleton
Defendant: T. J. Means
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ben Carter, et al v. ATM Vancom of Las Vegas, et al
as 09-15172
Plaintiff: BEN CARTER, ESTEBAN MORA and IDA M. CLARK
Plaintiff - Appellant: GENE E. SMITH, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee: ATM VANCOM OF LAS VEGAS, BARRY GOLDSMITH, CHUCK KELLOGG and others
Victor, et al. v. Lawler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02058
Plaintiff: William Victor and Demetrius Bailey
Defendant: R. M. Lawler, M. W. Harlow, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEANS et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62626
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PORTER-HAYDEN and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS J. MEANS, MARY MEANS, MARY MEANS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?