Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04298
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00290
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04292
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mody et al v. Diez-Canseco et al
as 1:2026cv01860
Plaintiff:
Chirag Mody
Defendant:
Russell Diez-Canseco, Glenda Flanagan, Kofi Amoo-Gottfried and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
WILSON v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2026cv01444
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILSON
Defendant:
ALLEN, FOX, RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08315
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruiz v. Mohawk Correctional Facility Infirmary Department et al
as 9:2026cv01337
Plaintiff:
Braulio J. Ruiz
Defendant:
Mohawk Correctional Facility Infirmary Department and Marcy Correctional Facility Infirmary Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz-Romero v. Puerto Rico Department of Labor
as 26-1778
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Vocational Rehabilitation Program
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Arnold v. Powles et al
as 1:2026cv05724
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Arnold
Defendant:
Sgt. Dillion Powles, Sheriff Paul Arteta, Colonel Catletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
