Cases 1 - 10 of 921
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burklew v. J.A. Wolfson Corporation
as 8:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tim Burklew
Defendant:
J.A. Wolfson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Crimmins v. United States et al
as 7:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Crimmins
Defendant:
United States, J.A. Jamison, Carnales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Daniels et al
as 7:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Adrian Flores
Defendant:
J.A. Daniels and Richlands Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.A. et al v. CooperSurgical, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
J.A. and D.B.
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J.F. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
J.F. and J.F. on behalf of her child J.A., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Dabney v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
MARK DABNEY
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, A. REGALADO and J.A. REYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.A. v. Luna et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
J.A.
Defendant:
Jeff Luna, Dr. Lamont Jackson and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
