Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
NATALIE MURRAY, as Next Friend to J.R.M. v. Joplin R-VIII School District, et al.
as 3:2022cv05020
Plaintiff:
J.M., by next friend NATALIE MURRAY and Natalie Murray
Defendant:
Joplin R-VIII School District Board of Education, Norm Ridder, Kerry Sachetta and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Breashears v. Dorothy Day Limited Partnership LLC et al
as 0:2021cv00713
Plaintiff:
Angelo Mikale Breashears, J.M. and C.M.
Defendant:
Michelle Longwerth, Catholic Charities and Dorothy Day Limited Partnership LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trisha Farkarlun v. Deputy J.M. Hannig, et al
as 12-1863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Trisha Farkarlun
Defendant - Appellee:
Deputy J.M. Hannig, Sgt. Peterson, Deputy B. Novotny and others
Defendant:
Karina Landmesser, in her individual capacity and Joseph Klimmek, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
