Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Rogers v. Mieko
as 5:2016cv00054
Petitioner:
William Jack Rogers
Respondent:
Joseph Mieko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jack Rogers, et al v. Comcast Corp, et al
as 14-4520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK ROGERS, PAUL PINELLA and MARTHA KRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMCAST CORP, COMCAST MO GROUOP INC, COMCAST CABLE HOLDINGS, LLC and others
David Picray v. Jack Rogers, et al
as 12-35557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PICRAY
Defendant:
JOE HEEB
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK ROGERS, ROBERT VU and CHRIS GRAVES
Dutro et al v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2012cv02972
Plaintiff:
Amber Dutro , Glenda Stripes , Sarah Dutro and others
Defendant:
Country of Contra Costa , Calvery Open Bible Church , City of Antioch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al.
as 1:2011cv06270
Plaintiff:
Anne L Miller , Vernon York , George E Ballard and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Picray v. Heeb et al
as 6:2011cv06147
Defendant:
Chris Graves, Joe Heeb, Jack Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
David Picray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
