Cases 41 - 50 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re Florida Ballot Order Statute Litigation et al
as 8:2019cv00091
Plaintiff:
DSCC, DCCC, Terence Fleming and others
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee
In Re:
Election Systems & Software, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
National Republican Senatorial Committee and Republican Governors Association
Joseph Yennie v. Terrance Walters, et al
as 19-1406
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra A. Jacobson, Terrance M. Walters and Karrie Kelly
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Howard Yennie
Jacobson v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00451
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doxley v. Wallace et al
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Brandi Meridith, Ian Wallace, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Duane Doxley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black Elk et al v. Roy et al
as 0:2018cv03255
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Hollie, Rodney Thundercloud, Jamie Allen Andrews and others
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Holland v. Woodbury Clerk of Courts et al
as 5:2018cv04090
Defendant:
Judge Edward Jacobson, Erin Redmond, Iowa Judicial Qualifications Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce M Van Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woollen v. Jacobson Transportation Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01509
Defendant:
Jacobson Transportation Company, Inc. and Michele Willis
Plaintiff:
Shane Woollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
Kay Jacobson
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
