Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Anderson-Baldwin v. USA
as 0:2022cv03115
Petitioner:
Russell James Anderson-Baldwin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tubbs v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv12499
Plaintiff:
Robert Tubbs
Defendant:
Michael Lewis, James Anderson, M. Tank and others
Garcia v. Anderson, et al
as 22-1326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ANDERSON, CLARK SMITH, SPENCER GROVE and others
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Polis et al
as 1:2022cv02151
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Beth Gibson, Conor Flanigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Spencer Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Glossip et al
as 4:2022cv04083
Plaintiff:
James Anderson
Defendant:
Louis Glossip and Brad Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Spencer Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. INDIANA SHERIFF DEPARTMENT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv01919
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INDIANA SHERIFF DEPARTMENT COUNTY JAIL, PAROLE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JAMES ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. ALLEN COUNTY JAIL CONFINEMENT OFFICER et al
as 1:2021cv01917
Defendant:
ALLEN COUNTY JAIL CONFINEMENT OFFICER, ZACHARY T DAVIS, KYLE S POORS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JAMES ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
