Cases 51 - 60 of 224
Alexander v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Petitioner:
Calvin Lopez Alexander
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp v. Warden et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Unknown Warden
Petitioner:
George Lee Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bailey v. Cain et al
as 5:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Gary A Bailey
Defendant:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL et al v. ELI LILLY
as 1:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALDWELL, JANE COLLETT, TERRI HILL and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perkins v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00041
Respondent:
N Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Steve Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOATWRIGHT et al v. PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00481
Plaintiff:
BRYAN BOATWRIGHT , JAMES CALDWELL , DAYNE CLARK and others
Defendant:
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP, INC. and PSEG NUCLEAR LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Caldwell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00960
Plaintiff:
James Caldwell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harmon v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Eldridge J. Harmon
Defendant:
Louisiana State, James Caldwell, David Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Williams v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00018
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Thomas Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
