Cases 1 - 10 of 10
COFFMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
JAMES COFFMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COFFMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv20301
Plaintiff:
JAMES COFFMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coffman v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00597
Plaintiff:
Edward James Coffman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coffman v. Cain
as 3:2014cv00142
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Plaintiff:
James Coffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Sloan
as 5:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
James Coffman and Jeffrey Turley
Defendant:
Wesby L Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFFMAN et al v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv79557
Plaintiff:
JAMES COFFMAN, JAMES COFFMAN, LOREEN COFFMAN and others
Defendant:
GAF CORP., KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP., FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
William Coffman v. David Runnels, et al
as 09-16255
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES COFFMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID RUNNELS, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and SISTO, Warden
Richardson v. Coffman et al
as 1:2009cv00415
Plaintiff:
Willie Clarence Richardson
Defendant:
James Coffman and Swift Transportation Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CERUTTI et al
as 2:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
NANCY CERUTTI, NANCY CERUTTI, JAMES COFFMAN and others
Defendant:
FRITO LAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COFFMAN v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69524
Plaintiff:
JAMES COFFMAN
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
