Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Adams v. Powell County Kentucky et al
as 5:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Powell County Kentucky, Judge Lisa H. Whisman, Judge Gary Salyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
John James Cook, Jr
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Nikolas Cook, et al
as 21-13739
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NIKOLAS JAMES COOK
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65241
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63069
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60149
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutierres et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03381
Plaintiff:
Nicole Paine, Samuel James, Jr., Jeffrey Chadwick and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Cook
as 21-30330
Defendant / Appellant:
Willie James Cook
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31945
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27180
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
