Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Rucker v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2021cv00412
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority and James Davis
Plaintiff:
George Rucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Perry et al
as 3:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Davis
Defendant:
Magistrate James Davis, Investigator Young, Deputy Solicitor Brett Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2020cv00397
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Officer FNU Blount, John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Tishawn Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv00913
Respondent:
USA-2255
Petitioner:
Carl James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hubbard v. Powell et al
as 3:2019cv00577
Defendant:
Officer N. Petino, Officer S. McCauley, Lieutenant Sherard Tisdale and others
Plaintiff:
Aundrey Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. USA-2255
as 8:2018cv02012
Petitioner:
James Davis
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOGER v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. BOGER
Defendant:
JAMES D. FOSTER, MARK SPEARS and JAMES DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Abernathy et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Wayne Abernathy, Kent W. Brown, Clerk of Court Rutherford County, District, Superior and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Pate et al
as 8:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Darian Antonio Coleman
Defendant:
John Pate , Charlie Frazier , Leon Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
