Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Little v. Cutchin et al
as 4:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Chesterfield County, Judge Paul M. Burch, Judge Roger M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dixon v. Faucher et al
as 3:2017cv01716
Defendant:
Faucher, Cotto, Stadalnik and others
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Villano
as 17-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Harris v. Edwards et al
as 3:2017cv00326
Defendant:
James Dixon and John Bel Edwards
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Edwards et al
as 3:2017cv00195
Defendant:
James Dixon, John Bel Edwards and Public Defender Board
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Burton et al
as 2:2016cv14114
Plaintiff:
Damond J. Washington
Defendant:
Derwyn Burton, James Dixon, Zachary Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Santiago et al
as 3:2015cv01575
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Defendant:
Santiago, Martin and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Villano
as 14-1077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Villano
Oliphant v. Villano
as 14-1069
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Robert Villano
RASHID v. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2013cv00917
Plaintiff:
HAKIM ABDULLAH RASHID
Defendant:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, ROB LEE, SANFORD PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
