Cases 1 - 10 of 2,014
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Walker #230537 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
James Edward Walker #230537
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant, James v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin and Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust et al v. J. E. Simas Floors, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust, Board of Trustees of the District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
J. E. Simas Floors, Inc. d/b/a JE SIMAS FLOORS, a Nevada corporation, James Edward Simas, Taylor Simas Samms and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
(HC) Rile v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv00844
Petitioner:
James Edward Eloy Rile
Respondent:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lackey v. Unnamed
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
James Edward Lackey, Jr.
Respondent:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
