Cases 11 - 20 of 71
MITCHELL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2019cv00304
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MITCHELL
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00054
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PRATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MacAlpine v. Howell et al
as 1:2018cv00223
Respondent:
Jennifer Berry, Dennis L. Howell and Don Gast
Petitioner:
James Edward MacAlpine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
McConnell et al v. Watauga County et al
as 5:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
James Edward McConnell and Kim McConnell
Defendant:
Watauga County, Department of Social Services Watauga County, Thomas Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
L&M Transportation Services, Inc. v. McCurley
as 5:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
L&M Transportation Services, Inc.
Defendant:
James Edward McCurley, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
James Edward Campbell
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
PRATT v. USA
as 1:2016cv00876
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PRATT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Frazier v. USA
as 7:2016cv00211
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Edward Frazier, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Booker v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
James Edward Booker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
