Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Lambert v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02536
Plaintiff:
James Lambert, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivens-Baker v. Lambert
as 24-20141
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
James Lambert, Jr., Fomijang Claude, Mathew McNeil and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lambert v. LPQ USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv02934
Plaintiff:
James Lambert
Defendant:
LPQ USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rivens-Baker Jr v. Larue et al
as 4:2022cv02480
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker Jr
Defendant:
J. Larue, James Lambert, Jr., Fomijang Claude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Cook
as 22-65
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joe Baltas
Defendant / Appellee:
Rollin Cook, In His Individual and Official Capacities, a Connecticut DOC employee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Allen, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Little, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Rochon v. Lambert et al
as 6:2021cv04088
Plaintiff:
Jason Blaine Rochon
Defendant:
James Lambert, Andrew Ahrens, John Storment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Baltas v. Cook
as 3:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rollin Cook, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lambert v. Parker et al
as 1:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
James Lambert
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Dr. Elaina Rodela, CoreCivic/South Central Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
