Cases 1 - 10 of 304
Lynn v. Caldwell
as 3:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
James Lynn
Respondent:
Antoine G. Caldwell and Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lynn v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv04246
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nordstrom et al v. Shinn
as 2:2020cv00994
Plaintiff:
Israel Joseph Naranjo, Scott Alan Lehr, Scott Douglas Nordstrom and others
Defendant:
David Shinn and Jason Monson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Fremont County Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00507
Defendant:
Fremont County Sherriff, Don Vought, Hammel and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazy v. Wichita County Jail et al
as 7:2019cv00100
Petitioner:
James Lynn Mazy
Respondent:
Wichita County Jail and Wichita County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hines v. Calif Dept. of Corr and Rehab et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Jaffomo, Inc., Saff MD Inc (Beerman), Tatina Klmo and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hines v. Tatiana Kline & Assoc. et al
as 3:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Conrep Doctors Jaffms, Tatiana Kline & Assoc., Muuron Pelton and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lynn v. Caldwell et al
as 6:2018cv00123
Respondent:
Reggie A. Lampkin and Warden Antoine G. Caldwell
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
James Lynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hines v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv02310
Defendant:
P4 Cop, SDPD Homicide, Pelton and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hines v. Internal Affairs et al
as 3:2018cv00849
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Internal Affairs, Edward Kenny Costrares, Sr., Mr. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
