Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Gibson v. Stouffer et al
as 1:2013cv02040
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell Gibson
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, Gregg L. Hershberger, Kathleen Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv10743
Plaintiff:
Carol Maxwell and James Maxwell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maxwell v. Suffolk County Corr. Facility Medical Department
as 2:2013cv01627
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell
Defendant:
Suffolk County Corr. Facility Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv08178
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe(s), Green Haven Correctional Facility Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. USA
as 0:2012cv02756
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kelly James Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maxwell v. Doe et al
as 9:2012cv01521
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe(s), Green Haven Correctional Facility Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berestoff v. USA
as 3:2012cv01659
Petitioner:
James Maxwell Worthington Berestoff
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Berestoff v. Cozza-Rhodes
as 1:2012cv02271
Petitioner:
James Maxwell Worthington Berestoff
Respondent:
T.K. Cozza-Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States v. Kelly James Maxwell
as 11-1073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kelly James Maxwell
Berestoff v. Multnomah County Health Dept. et al
as 6:2010cv00851
MCDC ID # 707872:
James Maxwell Worthin Berestoff
Defendant:
Corrections Health, Mental Health Section, Multnomah County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
