Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Neal v. Nabors Drilling U S A L P et al
as 6:2011cv00648
Plaintiff:
James Neal
Defendant:
Nabors Drilling U S A L P and John Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jose Lopez v. Correctional Med Serv, et al
as 11-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MED SERV, LOUIS TRIPOLI, WILLIAM ANDRADE and others
NEAL v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv62114
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES NEAL
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06347
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ALLEN , ALFRED GILBERT , TERESA A. HALL and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANNO et al v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04596
Plaintiff:
LANCE MANNO and MARYANN MANNO
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC , COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCNAMARA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAMARA, JR. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv03651
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. MCNAMARA, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Neal Connell v. Kimberly-Clark Corp
as 10-2637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES NEAL CONNELL
Defendant - Appellant:
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
Neal v. Stanford et al
as 7:2010cv00163
Defendant:
A. Mullins, S. Roberts, K. Schlobohm and others
Plaintiff:
James Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv64280
Plaintiff:
DEBORA COOK and JAMES NEAL COOK
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
