Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ameur v. Gates et al
as 2:2011cv01671
Plaintiff:
Mammar Ameur
Defendant:
Robert M Gates, Gordon England, Donald Rumsfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENKO v. GATES et al
as 1:2010cv01702
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RAHIM ABDUL RAZAK AL JENKO
Defendant:
ROBERT M. GATES, DONALD RUMSFELD, PAUL WOLFOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamad v. Gates et al
as 2:2010cv00591
Plaintiff:
Adel Hassan Hamad
Defendant:
Robert M Gates, Donald H Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ALHAMI v. RUMSFELD et al
as 2:2009cv01917
Plaintiff:
RAFIQ ALHAMI
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, RICHARD MYERS, GEOFFREY MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
AL-ZAHRANI v. DONALD RUMSFELD, et al
as 1:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
TALAL AL-ZAHRANI, TALAL AL-ZAHRANI, ALI ABDULLAH AHMED AL-SALAMI and others
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, RICHARD MYERS, PETER PACE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hill v. USA
as 5:2008cv01702
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James T Hill
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ALLAITHI v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2008cv01677
Plaintiff:
SAMI ABDULAZIZ ALLAITHI
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, RICHARD MYERS, JAMES T. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Luba Hill v. James T Hill
as 8:2007cv00823
Defendant:
James T Hill
Plaintiff:
Luba Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. Hill et al
as 3:2007cv00330
Plaintiff:
Luba Hill
Defendant:
James T. Hill, Cohen & Wolf, PC, Austin Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hill v. Hill et al
as 3:2007mc00069
Plaintiff:
Luba Hill
Defendant:
James T. Hill, Cohen & Wolf, PC, Austin Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.