Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Abel et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11765
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Dupont De Nemours, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Wesley Abel, Rhonda Lacey Almasri, Michael Ali Alqassimi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
James Z. Forbes v. PIP-East, LLC, et al
as 25-2460
Plaintiff:
JAMES Z. FORBES
Defendant:
PIP-EAST, LLC, now known as the PIP-Group, LLC, MINDFUL MEANS, LLC, RICHARD MCCALLA and others
James Z. Forbes v. PIP-East, LLC, et al
as 25-2459
Plaintiff:
JAMES Z. FORBES
Defendant:
PIP-EAST, LLC, now known as the PIP-Group, LLC, MINDFUL MEANS, LLC, RICHARD MCCALLA and others
Forbes v. Pipe East LLC
as 1:2025cv08540
Plaintiff:
James Z Forbes
Defendant:
Pipe East LLC, Mindful Means, LLC, Richard McCalla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORBES v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03777
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR FORBES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Forbes v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Forbes
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
FORBES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55042
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGLAS FORBES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forbes v. Detective Case #5511
as 1:2021cv03279
Plaintiff:
James Ricardo Forbes
Defendant:
Detective Case #5511
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Viacom International Inc. v. James Jude Forbes
as 2:2020mc00085
Petitioner:
Viacom International Inc.
Defendant:
James Jude Forbes
FORBES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82876
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR FORBES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
