Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wayne Patterson v. John Chambers, et al
as 22-3235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE PATTERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN JASON CHAMBERS, Judge, individually and in his official capacity, JOHN DOE, individually and in his official capacity and JANE DOE, individually and in her official capacity
Harding v. Grisham, et al
as 22-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ALLEN HARDING
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GRISHAM, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Love County, a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma, LOVE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, sued as Love County, a politcal subdivision of the State of Oklahoma, JEFF MULLINAX, in his official capacity as a Deputy Sheriff of Love County, State of Oklahoma and others
Trevino v. Gutierrez
as 22-40229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Reyes Lujan Trevino
Defendant / Appellee:
Armando Gutierrez, Individually and in his official capacity, Victor Lujan, Individually and in his official capacity, Jane Doe, Individually and in her official capacity and others
Pickel, et al v. Lancaster County Children, et al
as 20-3228
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE VAN CISCO, Individually and Her Official Capacity, KAYLA TEEPLES, individually and in her official capacity, CRYSTAL A. NATAN, Individually and in Her Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA PICKEL and MARK PICKEL
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Individually and in her official capacity
Liang v. City of New York
as 18-1305
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Gary Liang
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Ivan Quek, AKA Ivan Sun and Yi Jing Tan, AKA Kerry
Defendant - Appellee:
Detective Robert Zee, individually and in his official capacity as a Detective in the New York City Police Department, Albert Hawkins, individually and in his official capacity as a Detective in the New York City Police Department, Detective Shim, individually and in his official capacity as a Detective in the New York City Police Department and others
Defendant:
Officer, Sergeant Natoli, individually and in his official capacity as a Sergeant in the New York City Police Department, John Doe, individually and in his official capacity as a New York City Police Officer; and others
Pemberton v. Patton, et al
as 15-6129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. PATTON, New Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections Substitute, in his official capacity, MARY FALLIN, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, in her official capacity only, JUSTIN JONES, Individuall and as Past Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Pemberton v. Patton, et al
as 15-6089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. PATTON, New Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections Substitute, in his official capacity, MARY FALLIN, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, in her official capacity only, JUSTIN JONES, Individuall and as Past Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-32
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Steven Thomas v. R. Holly
as 12-2076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN WAYNE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellant:
R. V. HOLLY, individually, MARK MELTON, individually, M. D. SMITH, individually and others
Defendant:
PABLO MORA, individually, JOHN DOE, individually, JOHN DOE, individually and others
Aaron Tobey v. Jane Doe
as 11-2276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AARON TOBEY
Defendant - Appellant:
JANE DOE, individually and in her official capacity as a TSA Checkpoint Manager with the Transportation Security Administration of the Department of Homeland Security
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, JOHN S. PISTOLE, in his official capacity as Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, CAPITAL REGION AIRPORT COMMISSION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
