Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Marrero v. Mayor Johnson and the Dallas City Municipality et al
as 3:2024cv02690
Defendant: Bridgette Whitmore, Stacy Williams, Victor John and others
Plaintiff: Tito E Marrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
THOMAS v. U.S. DIS. COURT SO. DIS. OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff: GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES (MERRICK GARLAND), JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and U.S. DIS. COURT SO. DIS. OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrero v. Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv02010
Defendant: Sharon Middlebrooks, Dallas Municipality, Kevin Wiley and others
Plaintiff: Tito E Marrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Timothy Hatton v. James P. Hanlon, et al
as 24-2037
Petitioner: TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent: JAMES P. HANLON, JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and MATTHEW P. BROOKMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00259
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Levi Walters v. Jane Magnus-Stinson
as 23-1112
Petitioner: LEVI A. WALTERS
Respondent: JANE MAGNUS-STINSON
EASTERLING v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02167
Plaintiff: WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JAMES P. HANLON, JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
David Morgan v. Jane Magnus-Stinson
as 22-2756
Petitioner: DAVID B. MORGAN
Respondent: JANE MAGNUS-STINSON
Atkins v. Sykes
as 21-2344
Plaintiff / Appellant: REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE DIANE S. SYKES, JUDGE WILLIAM J. BAUER, JUDGE JOEL M. FLAUM and others
Ryze Claims Solutions, LLC v. Jane Magnus-Stinson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2930
Petitioner: RYZE CLAIMS SOLUTIONS, LLC
Interested Party: LESLIE BILLINGS
Respondent: JANE MAGNUS-STINSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?