Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Robinson v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05354
Plaintiff:
Janice Robinson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wayne Resper v. YesCare Corp.
as 22-7021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE RESPER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, HOLLY HOOVER, NP, SUSAN PRYOR and others
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Janice Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Resper v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00378
Defendant:
Wayne Resper, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Holly Hoover, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Resper v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Wayne Resper
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Holly Hoover, NP, Brittany Hamlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Watkins v. USA Dept of the Treasury et al
as 1:2021cv04532
Plaintiff:
Clover Janice Watkins and Clover Janice Robinson
Defendant:
Australia England Government, Pentagon, Jackfrost Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv03223
Defendant:
Janice Robinson, Michael Klepitch, Asresahegn Getachew and others
Plaintiff:
Da'Juan Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aurel v. Hoover et al
as 1:2020cv02349
Defendant:
Nikki Wilson, Mike Klepitch, Getache Asresahegn and others
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aurel v. Hoover, NPLP et al
as 1:2020cv01339
Defendant:
Janice Robinson, R.N., Wendy Orosco, CMA, Linae Llewellyn, LPN and others
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robinson et al v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv03193
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Robinson and Janice Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
