Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Jason Engle v. Mark Plawecki, et al
as 26-1365
Defendant:
MARK J. PLAWECKI, Judge, FLOYD BUNKER, Officer, 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF DEARBORN HIEIGHTS, MI and others
Plaintiff:
JASON RICHARD ENGLE, nka Jason Wyatt Engel
Noor v. Buchanan et al
as 2:2025cv05599
Plaintiff:
Ferouz Noor
Defendant:
Jason Richard Marcus Buchanan, SGM Services, LLC and CMH Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
In re: David Gonzales
as 25-11035
Petitioner:
In re: David Gonzales
Respondent:
Allen Jackie Jones, Jason Richard Kemp, Lawrence Farrell Harris and others
United States of America v. Property et al
as 5:2025cv01505
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kelly L Short, Jason Richard Short and Property
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 831 dd - Land Condemnation
Torrez v. USA
as 1:2025cv01738
Petitioner:
Jason Richard Torrez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Engle [ENJOINED] v. Plawecki et al
as 2:2025cv11544
Defendant:
Mark J Plawecki, Floyd Bunker, 20th District Court of Dearborn Heights and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Engle [ENJOINED]
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Richards v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2025sf65811
Plaintiff:
Jason Richards
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jason Cox v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1418
Petitioner:
JASON RICHARD COX
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
United States v. Jason Heider
as 24-1129
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Richard Heider
Dawkins v. Bay Area Recovery Center et al
as 4:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Dawkins
Defendant:
Bay Area Recovery Center, Greg Joiner, Michael Chote and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
