Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Scott v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Sivak v. Newhouse, et al.
as 26-2742
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
ROBERT NEWHOUSE, BYRON LYNN WINMILL, RICHARD BEVAN and others
Celtic Bank Corporation v. Allevato et al
as 2:2026cv00275
Defendant:
Five Star Home Foods LLC, Jason Scott Allevato, Courtney Fitzpatrick Allevato and others
Plaintiff:
Celtic Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Wright v. Martin Transport, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv00071
Plaintiff:
Paige Wright
Defendant:
Martin Transport, Inc. and Jason Scott O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Scott v. Maxim Hair Restoration, LLC
as 1:2026cv02256
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott
Defendant:
Maxim Hair Restoration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping - Injunctive Relief or Civil Fine
Dixon v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2026cv00258
Petitioner:
Jason Scott Dixon
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sivak v. Newhouse et al
as 1:2026cv00098
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Robert G Newhouse, Byron Lynn Winmill, D. Richard Bevan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2026cv00675
Petitioner:
Jason Scott Simmons
Respondent:
Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Hurley
as 25-7555
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JASON SCOTT HURLEY
Woods v. Kids Central Inc. et al
as 5:2025cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Woods
Defendant:
Kids Central Inc. and Florida Department of Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
