Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mathis v. Anderson County et al
as 8:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Grayson Mathis, Sr
Defendant:
Anderson County, Anderson County Sheriffs Office, Anderson, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Burgess v. Turner et al
as 5:2021cv00920
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
Wells Turner, Martha Williams, Jeff Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Plaintiff:
Valentine Pasci, Raul Marquez, Mark Wicklund and others
Defendant:
Kurtiss Morrison, Steven Alexander, Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alexander v. Gentry et al
as 5:2020cv01206
Defendant:
Floyd Lee, Matt Houge, Matt Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb D Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calder v. Madison County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2018cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Calder
Defendant:
Madison County Fiscal Court , Doug Thomas , Tom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker (ID 0118460) v. Gilmore et al
as 5:2018cv03042
Plaintiff:
James K. Walker
Defendant:
Tina Gilmore, (fnu) Kasper, (fnu) Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Gentry et al
as 5:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
David Dotson
Defendant:
Matt Gentry, James Markey, Captain Lee and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karen Lawrence v. Madison County, et al
as 16-5487
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAREN LAWRENCE, Personal Representative for the Estate of Charles Hoffman
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY, CHRISTINE E. GREENE, WILLIAM TYLER O'BRIEN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DOUG THOMAS, Individually and in his official capacity
Collins v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2008cv00887
Plaintiff:
Claude D. Collins
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Bruce Bennett, Randy Pinion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
